On this planet of sports activities dietary supplements, there’s a long-standing debate round creatine HCL vs monohydrate.
Each contenders, HCL creatine and creatine monohydrate, have their loyalists, every swearing by the advantages of their chosen kind.
However in research evaluating creatine monohydrate vs HCL, how do these kinds of creatine differ, what are their execs and cons, and which comes out on prime?
Get evidence-based solutions to those questions and extra on this article.
What Is Creatine?
Creatine is a pure compound comprising the amino acids L-arginine, glycine, and methionine.
Your physique produces creatine naturally, however it might additionally take up and retailer creatine from meals like meat, eggs, and fish.
Creatine accelerates the method that produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP), our cells’ major power supply.
Taking creatine sports activities dietary supplements vastly increases your physique’s creatine shops, resulting in increased muscle progress, improved power and energy, better anaerobic capability, reduced fatigue, less muscle harm and soreness after train, modified gene expression regarding hypertrophy, and greater muscle retention after grueling exercises.
Creatine HCL vs. Monohydrate: Variations
Creatine monohydrate is creatine sure to at least one molecule of water (“mono” which means one and “hydrate” referring to water).
It’s essentially the most well-studied kind of creatine out there, and research repeatedly reveals that creatine monohydrate dietary supplements are protected and enhance your athletic efficiency as a lot or greater than different types of creatine.
Through the years, producers have modified creatine in varied methods within the hopes of creating a kind of creatine that’s simpler than monohydrate.
Creatine hydrochloride (HCL) is one such kind.
HCL creatine is chemically much like monohydrate, solely the creatine molecules bind to hydrochloric acid relatively than water.
This distinction provides creatine HCL two potential benefits over monohydrate:
- Improved solubility: HCL is extra “soluble” in water (it dissolves extra simply) than monohydrate.
- Enhanced absorption: HCL strikes via the intestine wall extra effectively than monohydrate, optimizing the quantity your physique makes use of.
Some consider these potential advantages imply you want much less HCL creatine to fill muscle cells, resulting in much less creatine excretion and abdomen discomfort.
Creatine HCL vs. Monohydrate: The Proof
Three studies support the theoretical advantages of creatine HCL.
Nonetheless, none concerned human individuals—scientists studied HCL and monohydrate solubility utilizing lab gear and assessed absorption utilizing human cells, pig pores and skin, and rat brains.
Given the variations in how varied species store and course of creatine, it’s unsure if these findings would translate to dwelling people. Even when they did, the advantages won’t be as important as anticipated.
That’s as a result of the few research that pit creatine monohydrate vs. HCL present they’re equally efficient.
In a single study revealed within the journal Meals and Diet Sciences, researchers had weightlifters take creatine monohydrate or creatine HCL every day for 4 weeks whereas following a power coaching program.
The outcomes confirmed that all the weightlifters gained comparable power on the bench and leg press, however those that took HCL appeared to lose extra fats and achieve extra “fat-free mass” (a proxy for muscle).
Whereas this may seem to be a victory for HCL, two factors warrant warning.
First, the researchers decided the weightlifters’ physique fats proportion utilizing skinfold calipers, a way recognized for its inaccuracy. Therefore, errors throughout measuring may simply have induced the modifications in physique fats proportion.
And second, the examine famous that solely these taking HCL noticed a major enhance in fat-free mass regardless that the monohydrate group noticed a bigger enhance (3.5 kilos vs. 3.7 kilos), a discrepancy the authors failed to elucidate.
In a subsequent study by the identical analysis staff, athletes taking HCL and monohydrate noticed related will increase in lean physique mass (one other proxy for muscle) and power, however solely these taking HCL noticed a lower in fats.
Once more, the scientists used skinfold calipers to find out these modifications, which makes it tough to attract agency conclusions from their findings.
Within the final study to match creatine monohydrate vs. HCL, researchers discovered that each HCL and monohydrate failed to enhance athletic efficiency and anabolic (“muscle-building”) hormone ranges in younger males after one week.
These findings are unsurprising contemplating the time creatine takes to exert its results and its minimal impact on hormone ranges.
Creatine HCL vs. Monohydrate: Execs and Cons
Scientists developed creatine HCL to sidestep monohydrate’s most frequent unwanted side effects: water retention and weight achieve.
These unwanted side effects usually have an effect on individuals throughout a creatine “loading section,” the place you’re taking larger doses for the primary week of taking creatine monohydrate to accelerate its accumulation in your muscle tissues.
Throughout this time, your physique may retain extra water than if you happen to took smaller doses, probably inflicting momentary bloating and weight achieve.
Due to its chemical composition, HCL creatine is 38 instances extra soluble than monohydrate and probably extra “bioavailable.” As such, many consider taking HCL helps you keep away from hostile unwanted side effects because you eat much less water and creatine than when supplementing with monohydrate.
Whereas these benefits sound promising, no proof confirms them in people, so you must consider them as “potential” relatively than “confirmed” advantages till scientists affirm them with high-quality analysis.
One more reason to not get too jazzed about these potential “execs” is that loading creatine monohydrate is elective.
In case you’re apprehensive about experiencing unwanted side effects, you’ll be able to merely skip the loading section and take 3-to-5 grams every day as a substitute. This method could imply you need to wait barely longer to expertise creatine’s performance-enhancing advantages, but it surely received’t influence its long-term effectiveness.
In different phrases, there’s no assure HCL has any benefits over monohydrate. And even when it does, you’ll be able to offset these benefits by taking much less monohydrate if you start supplementing.
A serious downside of selecting HCL over monohydrate is the associated fee.
In a systematic review by the College of Colorado, researchers discovered that almost all types of creatine enhance efficiency to an analogous diploma, however creatine monohydrate is considerably extra inexpensive. In keeping with their evaluation, the typical price of a 5-gram serving of HCL is $1.10.
In the meantime, a 5-gram serving of monohydrate prices simply $0.29.
Creatine HCL vs. Monohydrate: Frequent Aspect Results
As famous earlier, HCL creatine could barely cut back your threat of water retention, bloating, and momentary weight achieve in comparison with creatine monohydrate.
That mentioned, skipping the loading section when utilizing monohydrate can even mitigate these unwanted side effects.
Other than these minor and often short-lived unwanted side effects, supplementing with creatine is mostly protected, even when taking giant every day doses (30 grams per day) for a number of years.
Opposite to what some say, there’s no proof it causes zits, complications, or high blood pressure. Furthermore, it doesn’t disturb sleep, nearly definitely doesn’t cause hair loss, and offered you’ve got wholesome kidneys, it won’t harm kidney well being, both.
Creatine HCL vs. Creatine Monohydrate: Which Is Greatest?
Analysis reveals that creatine of any type improves your athletic efficiency in quite a few methods.
Nonetheless, no kind of creatine is as well-studied, protected, cost-effective, and dependable as creatine monohydrate.
Thus, monohydrate is the clear winner in a battle between creatine monohydrate vs. HCL.
For a pure supply of micronized creatine monohydrate that additionally consists of two different components to reinforce muscle progress and enhance restoration, attempt Recharge.
(In case you aren’t positive if Recharge is best for you or if one other complement may higher suit your funds, circumstances, and targets, then take the Legion Supplement Finder Quiz! In lower than a minute, it’ll inform you precisely what dietary supplements are best for you. Click here to check it out.)
FAQ #1: Does creatine make you greater?
Sure.
Creatine increases the quantity of water held in muscle cells, making your muscle tissues seem greater.
It additionally positively impacts nitrogen balance and the expression of sure genes, which helps you achieve measurement by boosting muscle growth.
FAQ #2: When is the most effective time to take creatine for muscle achieve?
There’s no “greatest time to take creatine.”
Research reveals it really works completely effectively if you take it at any time of the day.
FAQ #3: What occurs if you cease taking creatine?
The creatine shops in your muscle tissues will regularly deplete, inflicting your athletic efficiency to dip.
This doesn’t occur in a single day, although.
Offered your muscle tissues are absolutely saturated if you cease, you’ll be able to expect to hold onto roughly 80% of your saved creatine for as much as 2 weeks, and it’ll take round a month of not taking creatine earlier than your ranges return to “baseline.”
FAQ #4: Can you’re taking creatine earlier than mattress?
Sure.
Creatine isn’t a stimulant, so taking it earlier than mattress received’t disturb your sleep.
Creatine could reduce complete and deep sleep length in animals.
Whereas decreasing sleep length and high quality often harms psychological and bodily efficiency, other studies show that people taking creatine are mentally and bodily sharper, even when sleep-deprived.
Thus, it’s attainable (although extremely speculative) that creatine may cut back your want for sleep and counteract the drawbacks of sleep deprivation.
FAQ #5: How a lot water ought to I drink with creatine?
For greatest outcomes, observe the producer’s directions.
This often means taking creatine with 8-to-12 ounces of water.
+ Scientific References
- Cooper, Robert, et al. “Creatine Supplementation with Specific View to Exercise/Sports Performance: An Update.” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 1, 20 July 2012, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407788/, https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-9-33.
- Darrabie, Marcus D., et al. “AMPK and Substrate Availability Regulate Creatine Transport in Cultured Cardiomyocytes.” American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 300, no. 5, 1 May 2011, pp. E870-876, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21364119/, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00554.2010. Accessed 23 Dec. 2021.
- Guzun, R., et al. “Systems Bioenergetics of Creatine Kinase Networks: Physiological Roles of Creatine and Phosphocreatine in Regulation of Cardiac Cell Function.” Amino Acids, vol. 40, no. 5, 10 Mar. 2011, pp. 1333–1348, link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00726-011-0854-x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-011-0854-x. Accessed 18 Nov. 2019.
- McCall, Wesley, and Adam M. Persky. “Pharmacokinetics of Creatine.” Sub-Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 46, 2007, pp. 261–273, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18652081/. Accessed 18 Oct. 2023.
- Jd, Branch. “Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Body Composition and Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 1 June 2003, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12945830/.
- Camic, Clayton L, et al. “The Effects of Polyethylene Glycosylated Creatine Supplementation on Muscular Strength and Power.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 24, no. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 3343–3351, https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181fc5c5c. Accessed 14 Apr. 2019.
- Eckerson, Joan M., et al. “Effect of Creatine Phosphate Supplementation on Anaerobic Working Capacity and Body Weight after Two and Six Days of Loading in Men and Women.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2005, p. 756, https://doi.org/10.1519/r-16924.1.
- Anomasiri, Wilai, et al. “Low Dose Creatine Supplementation Enhances Sprint Phase of 400 Meters Swimming Performance.” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet Thangphaet, vol. 87 Suppl 2, 1 Sept. 2004, pp. S228-232, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16083193/. Accessed 7 July 2021.
- Safdar, Adeel, et al. “Global and Targeted Gene Expression and Protein Content in Skeletal Muscle of Young Men Following Short-Term Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation.” Physiological Genomics, vol. 32, no. 2, Jan. 2008, pp. 219–228, https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00157.2007.
- Tang, Fu-Chun, et al. “Contribution of Creatine to Protein Homeostasis in Athletes after Endurance and Sprint Running.” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 1, 8 Feb. 2013, pp. 61–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-013-0498-6. Accessed 19 Feb. 2019.
- Kreider, Richard B., et al. “International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Safety and Efficacy of Creatine Supplementation in Exercise, Sport, and Medicine.” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, vol. 14, no. 1, 13 June 2017, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z.
- Stockbrugger, Barry A., and Robert G. Haennel. “Contributing Factors to Performance of a Medicine Ball Explosive Power Test: A Comparison between Jump and Nonjump Athletes.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 17, no. 4, 1 Nov. 2003, pp. 768–774, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14636108/, https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)0172.0.co;2.
- Gufford, Brandon T., et al. “Physicochemical Characterization of Creatine N-Methylguanidinium Salts.” Journal of Dietary Supplements, vol. 7, no. 3, 1 Sept. 2010, pp. 240–252, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22432515/, https://doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2010.491507. Accessed 5 Nov. 2020.
- Gufford, Brandon T., et al. “PH-Dependent Stability of Creatine Ethyl Ester: Relevance to Oral Absorption.” Journal of Dietary Supplements, vol. 10, no. 3, 1 Sept. 2013, pp. 241–251, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469200/, https://doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2013.822453. Accessed 10 Nov. 2021.
- Alraddadi, Eman, et al. “Absolute Oral Bioavailability of Creatine Monohydrate in Rats: Debunking a Myth.” Pharmaceutics, vol. 10, no. 1, 8 Mar. 2018, p. 31, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10010031. Accessed 12 May 2021.
- Kreider, Richard B. “Species-Specific Responses to Creatine Supplementation.” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 285, no. 4, Oct. 2003, pp. R725–R726, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00375.2003. Accessed 26 Oct. 2020.
- França, Elias de, et al. “Creatine HCl and Creatine Monohydrate Improve Strength but Only Creatine HCl Induced Changes on Body Composition in Recreational Weightlifters.” Food and Nutrition Sciences, vol. 06, 2015, p. 1624, www.scirp.org/html/5-2701782_62283.htm#txtF9, https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2015.617167.
- Fernandes, Caroline, et al. Comparison between Creatine Monohydrate and Creatine HCl on Body Composition and Performance of the Brazilian Olympic Team. 28 Mar. 2019.
- Tayebi, Milad , and Hamid Arazi. Is Creatine Hydrochloride Better than Creatine Monohydrate for the Improvement of Physical Performance and Hormonal Changes in Young Trained Men? Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2019.07.013.
- Bemben, Michael G, and Hugh S Lamont. “Creatine Supplementation and Exercise Performance.” Sports Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, 2005, pp. 107–125, link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00007256-200535020-00002, https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535020-00002.
- Kutz, Matthew R., and Michael J. Gunter. “Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation on Body Weight and Percent Body Fat.” The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 17, no. 4, 2003, p. 817, https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017%3C0817:cmsobw%3E2.0.co;2. Accessed 1 Apr. 2019.
- Powers, Michael E., et al. “Creatine Supplementation Increases Total Body Water without Altering Fluid Distribution.” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 38, no. 1, 2003, pp. 44–50, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC155510/.
- Hultman, E., et al. “Muscle Creatine Loading in Men.” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 81, no. 1, July 1996, pp. 232–237, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8828669/, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.232.
- Fazio, Carly, et al. “Efficacy of Alternative Forms of Creatine Supplementation on Improving Performance and Body Composition in Healthy Subjects.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. Publish Ahead of Print, 11 Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003873. Accessed 10 Nov. 2021.
- MIHIC, SASA, et al. “Acute Creatine Loading Increases Fat-Free Mass, but Does Not Affect Blood Pressure, Plasma Creatinine, or CK Activity in Men and Women.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 32, no. 2, Feb. 2000, p. 291, https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200002000-00007. Accessed 22 Apr. 2020.
- van der Merwe, Johann, et al. “Three Weeks of Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation Affects Dihydrotestosterone to Testosterone Ratio in College-Aged Rugby Players.” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 19, no. 5, Sept. 2009, pp. 399–404, https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181b8b52f.
- Carvalho, Ana Paula Perillo Ferreira, et al. “Suplementação Com Creatina Associada Ao Treinamento Resistido Não Altera as Funções Renal E Hepática.” Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, vol. 17, no. 4, Aug. 2011, pp. 237–241, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-86922011000400004. Accessed 4 Jan. 2022.
- Davani-Davari, Dorna, et al. “Potential Adverse Effects of Creatine Supplement on the Kidney in Athletes and Bodybuilders.” Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, 1 Oct. 2018, pp. 253–260, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30367015/.
- Parise, G., et al. “Effects of Acute Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation on Leucine Kinetics and Mixed-Muscle Protein Synthesis.” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 91, no. 3, 1 Sept. 2001, pp. 1041–1047, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.3.1041.
- Candow, Darren G., et al. “Strategic Creatine Supplementation and Resistance Training in Healthy Older Adults.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, vol. 40, no. 7, July 2015, pp. 689–694, https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0498.
- Dworak, Markus, et al. “Creatine Supplementation Reduces Sleep Need and Homeostatic Sleep Pressure in Rats.” Journal of Sleep Research, vol. 26, no. 3, 11 Apr. 2017, pp. 377–385, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12523. Accessed 10 Dec. 2021.
- McMorris, T., et al. “Effect of Creatine Supplementation and Sleep Deprivation, with Mild Exercise, on Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance, Mood State, and Plasma Concentrations of Catecholamines and Cortisol.” Psychopharmacology, vol. 185, no. 1, 17 Jan. 2006, pp. 93–103, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0269-z.
- McMorris, T., et al. “Creatine Supplementation, Sleep Deprivation, Cortisol, Melatonin and Behavior.” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 90, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 21–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.024.
- Cook, Christian J, et al. “Skill Execution and Sleep Deprivation: Effects of Acute Caffeine or Creatine Supplementation – a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, vol. 8, no. 1, 16 Feb. 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-8-2. Accessed 17 Feb. 2020.